hkr.sePublications
System disruptions
There are recurring service disruptions on some of the search portals due to high traffic. We are working to resolve the issue, you may temporarily encounter an error message.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Two‐ and ten‐year follow‐up of patients responding and non‐responding to the surgical treatment of peri‐implantitis: A retrospective evaluation
Kristianstad University, Faculty of Health Science, Research environment Oral Health - Public Health - Quality of Life (OHAL). Kristianstad University, Faculty of Health Science, Department of Oral Health.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0992-2362
Region Västra Götaland.
Region Västra Götaland.
Japan.
2021 (English)In: Clinical Oral Implants Research, ISSN 0905-7161, E-ISSN 1600-0501, Vol. 32, no 4, p. 410-421Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Objectives: To report a follow-upof patients following the surgical anti-infective treatment of peri-implantitis and to identify possible risk indicators for the progression of disease during supportive peri-implant therapy. Material and Methods: Following peri-implant surgery, 41 patients (213 implants) were enrolled in a supportive peri-implant therapy. At the 2-year follow-up, two groups of patients were identified, with or without residual peri-implant pockets (responding and non-responding group). Eighteen patients (85 implants) of the non-responding group were followed for further 8 years. Results: At the 2-year examination, 73 of the 117 treated implants (62.4%) presented healthy peri-implant condition, while 44 (37.6%) presented persisting peri-implantitis associated with substantial bone loss before treatment. The 10-year examination of the non-responding group revealed that 1) 84% of the implants that regained health following surgery remained healthy during the entire observation period; 2) 66% of the implants with residual pockets following surgery maintained stable peri-implant condition; and 3) 29% of all treated implants showed disease progression, and 11 of those were extracted. Presence of pockets at 3–4 sites of the implants was identified as risk indicator for progression of peri-implantitis. Conclusion: The peri-implant health achieved following therapy was maintained formost of the implants during the follow-up. Residual pockets were a frequent finding at implants with substantial bone loss before treatment. Presence of pockets around the entire circumference of the implants resulted as a risk indicator for further disease progression. The probability of progression of peri-implant disease increased with increased observation time.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2021. Vol. 32, no 4, p. 410-421
Keywords [en]
Dental implants, follow-up study, Peri-implantitis/surgery, risk factors, treatment outcome
National Category
Dentistry
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hkr:diva-21797DOI: 10.1111/clr.13711ISI: 000614500300001PubMedID: 33449388OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hkr-21797DiVA, id: diva2:1543161
Available from: 2021-04-09 Created: 2021-04-09 Last updated: 2021-04-30Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedFulltext

Authority records

Renvert, Stefan

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Renvert, Stefan
By organisation
Research environment Oral Health - Public Health - Quality of Life (OHAL)Department of Oral Health
In the same journal
Clinical Oral Implants Research
Dentistry

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 270 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf