hkr.sePublications
System disruptions
There are recurring service disruptions on some of the search portals due to high traffic. We are working to resolve the issue, you may temporarily encounter an error message.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Systematic screening as a tool for individualized rehabilitation following primary breast cancer treatment: study protocol for the ReScreen randomized controlled trial.
Kristianstad University, Faculty of Health Science, Avdelningen för sjuksköterskeutbildningarna och integrerad hälsovetenskap. Kristianstad University, Faculty of Health Science, Forskningsmiljön Människa - Hälsa - Samhälle (MHS). Kristianstad University, Faculty of Health Science, Research Environment PRO-CARE, Patient Reported Outcomes - Clinical Assessment Research and Education.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6879-9563
Lunds universitet.
Lunds universitet.
2020 (English)In: BMC Cancer, E-ISSN 1471-2407, Vol. 20, no 1Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

BACKGROUND: It is well known that women suffer from negative consequences following breast cancer (BC) treatment and that their largely varying needs for rehabilitation are often unmet. Up to 43% of these women are at risk of developing chronic distress requiring complex interventions; however, how to early identify and meet these women's needs is unknown, leaving them with suboptimal chances of rehabilitation. The aim of the ReScreen study is to develop a model for and evaluate the effect of screening-based, individualized rehabilitation following primary BC treatment.

METHODS: The ReScreen study is designed as a complex intervention. Women with newly diagnosed BC are consecutively included in a three-armed randomized controlled trial. At inclusion, patients score their distress level on the Distress Thermometer (scale of 0-10) aiming to identify patients with extended rehabilitation needs. Patients scoring ≥5 are randomized to the intervention or control group while patients scoring ≤4 are followed longitudinally as an observational group. Patients in the intervention group, in conjunction with a dedicated research nurse, create an individualized rehabilitation plan based on an evidence-based decision support tool that was developed to create a solid base for the intervention. The research nurse will act as a continuous health care contact and be responsible for proactively and systematically evaluating patients' needs to ensure that potential new problems or changed rehabilitation needs are identified throughout the 1-year follow-up period. The intervention will be evaluated through self-reported data focusing on physical and psychological outcomes as well as evaluation of satisfaction with care at baseline, 2 weeks and 3, 6, 9 and 12 months. Evaluation will also include health economic aspects based on register data and patients' and relatives' experiences of the rehabilitation process. In addition, optimal cut-off levels for distress as an indicator for extended rehabilitation needs will be investigated.

DISCUSSION: This study will provide important knowledge related to effectiveness of screening-based identification of rehabilitation needs and standardized evidence-based, individualized rehabilitation after primary BC treatment. With a complex intervention design, this study has the potential to form a comprehensive knowledge base which includes tools and guidelines for implementation into clinical practice.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03434717. Registered February 15, 2018.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2020. Vol. 20, no 1
Keywords [en]
Breast cancer, Individualization, RCT, Rehabilitation, Screening, Sickness absence, Symptom distress
National Category
Health Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hkr:diva-20623DOI: 10.1186/s12885-020-06815-3ISI: 000537960500002PubMedID: 32471390OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hkr-20623DiVA, id: diva2:1434125
Available from: 2020-06-02 Created: 2020-06-02 Last updated: 2024-07-04Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(2097 kB)163 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 2097 kBChecksum SHA-512
e8be3a02218454feb3cbea68d74ac2a9693b205d7d820a19e7fedc32fe4612108e5dadd80e512f2ccdc7f9627e7728a125a358b813be47bd12b33ad85606ba4e
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Olsson Möller, Ulrika
By organisation
Avdelningen för sjuksköterskeutbildningarna och integrerad hälsovetenskapForskningsmiljön Människa - Hälsa - Samhälle (MHS)Research Environment PRO-CARE, Patient Reported Outcomes - Clinical Assessment Research and Education
In the same journal
BMC Cancer
Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 164 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 161 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf