hkr.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Understanding communicative intentions and semiotic vehicles by children and chimpanzees
Lund University.
Lund University.
Lund University.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3257-4872
Lund University.
Show others and affiliations
2013 (English)In: Cognitive development, ISSN 0885-2014, E-ISSN 1879-226X, Vol. 28, no 3, 312-329 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Developmental and comparative studies of the ability to understand communicative intentions using object-choice tasks raise questions concerning the semiotic properties of the communicative signals, and the roles of rearing histories, language and familiarity. We adapted a study by Tomasello, Call, and Gluckman (1997), in which a “helper” indicated the location of a hidden reward to children of three ages (18, 24, and 30 months) and to four chimpanzees, by means of one of four cues: Pointing, Marker, Picture and Replica. For the chimpanzees, we controlled for familiarity by using two helpers, one unfamiliar and one highly familiar. Even 18-months performed well on Pointing and Marker, while only the oldest group clearly succeeded with Picture and Replica. Performance did not correlate with scores for the Swedish Early Communicative Development Inventory (SECDI). While there were no positive results for the chimpanzees on the group level, and no effect of familiarity, two chimpanzees succeeded on Pointing and Marker. Results support proposals of a species difference in understanding communicative intentions, but also highlight the need to distinguish these from the complexity of semiotic vehicles and to consider both factors.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2013. Vol. 28, no 3, 312-329 p.
Keyword [en]
Conventionality, familiarity, iconicity, indexicality, object-choice, pointing
National Category
Other Humanities Psychology (excluding Applied Psychology)
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hkr:diva-15202DOI: 10.1016/j.cogdev.2013.05.001OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hkr-15202DiVA: diva2:894925
Available from: 2016-01-17 Created: 2016-01-17 Last updated: 2017-11-30Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records BETA

Lenninger, Sara M.

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Lenninger, Sara M.
In the same journal
Cognitive development
Other HumanitiesPsychology (excluding Applied Psychology)

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 42 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf