hkr.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Nature of science progression in school year 1-9: an analysis of the Swedish curriculum and teachers’ suggestions
Kristianstad University, School of Education and Environment, Avdelningen för Naturvetenskap. Kristianstad University, Research environment Learning in Science and Mathematics (LISMA). (LISMA)ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8255-3607
Kristianstad University, School of Education and Environment, Avdelningen för Naturvetenskap. Kristianstad University, Research environment Learning in Science and Mathematics (LISMA). (LISMA)ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3175-5185
2015 (English)Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

Science education research on nature of science (NOS) has mostly focused students’ and teachers’ views of NOS, while less attention has been paid to the appropriateness of various NOS aspects at different levels in the educational system. Even more scarce is research focusing teachers’ perspectives on these matters. The aim of this study is to: 1) analyze NOS progression in the Swedish national curriculum, and 2) investigate science teachers’ perspectives on a NOS progression for year 1-9. Participants in the study are Swedish in-service science teachers (grades 1-9) who took part in a three-year research-project focusing NOS teaching. Throughout the project the teachers met in focus-group discussions. They also planned and implemented NOS lessons in their classrooms. Sources of data are: 1) curriculum material, and 2) two focus groups meetings about NOS progression (recorded and transcribed). The results show that many NOS aspects are, at least implicitly, part of the Swedish curriculum, but no specific progression is described. The teachers’ suggestions for NOS progression are based on arguments concerning the level of abstractness. Theoretical approaches and unfamiliar contexts are considered abstract, while hands-on activities, everyday contexts, and historical cases are considered concrete approaches to NOS.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2015.
Keyword [en]
Nature of science, curriculum, NOS progression, teachers
National Category
Didactics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hkr:diva-14481OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hkr-14481DiVA: diva2:847878
Conference
IHPST 13th Biennial International Conference, Rio de Janeiro, July 22-25, 2015.
Available from: 2015-08-21 Created: 2015-08-21 Last updated: 2016-04-01Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(567 kB)187 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 567 kBChecksum SHA-512
c267a0e279f4d23eb6e762bb8ec48eb02d224d47943562331ecbbe95579d1f25ceb416b9fc19e56271e50a26eb4fcfd0ef126525726be3aac09429be2df6b073
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

http://www.abq.org.br/ihpst2015/abstract,87.html

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Leden, LottaHansson, Lena
By organisation
Avdelningen för NaturvetenskapResearch environment Learning in Science and Mathematics (LISMA)
Didactics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 187 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Total: 408 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf