hkr.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Health status measurement in Parkinson's disease: validity of the PDQ-39 and Nottingham Health Profile
Section of Restorative Neurology, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, University Hospital, Lund. (Forskningsmiljön PRO-CARE)ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2174-372X
Galen Research, Manchester.
Galen Research, Manchester.
Section of Restorative Neurology, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, University Hospital, Lund.
2003 (English)In: Movement Disorders, ISSN 0885-3185, E-ISSN 1531-8257, Vol. 18, no 7, 773-783 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

We assessed the feasibility and psychometric properties of two commonly used health status questionnaires in Parkinson's disease (PD): the generic Nottingham Health Profile (NHP) and the disease-specific 39-item Parkinson's disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39), from a cross-sectional postal survey of PD patients (N = 81), using traditional and Rasch measurement methodologies. Overall response rate was 88%. Both questionnaires were found feasible, although the NHP performed less well. The PDQ-39 had fewer floor effects and was better able to separate respondents into distinct groups than the NHP, whereas the latter exhibited less ambiguous dimensionality and better targeting of respondents with non-extreme scores. Reliability and validity indices were similar, and potential differential item functioning by age and gender groups was found for both questionnaires. PDQ-39 response alternatives indicated ambiguity. With few exceptions, questionnaire scales were unable to meet recommended standards fully. While preliminary, this study illustrates the need for thorough evaluation of outcome measures and has implications beyond the questionnaires used here. Although promising, both questionnaires warrant further developmental work and stronger support of measurement validity before they could be considered fully suitable for valid use in PD, in particular in earlier stages of the disease.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2003. Vol. 18, no 7, 773-783 p.
Keyword [en]
Parkinson's disease, health status, measurement; evaluation, psychometrics, Rasch analysis
National Category
Neurology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hkr:diva-12254DOI: 10.1002/mds.10438PubMedID: 12815656OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hkr-12254DiVA: diva2:729817
Available from: 2014-06-26 Created: 2014-06-26 Last updated: 2014-09-15Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Hagell, Peter
In the same journal
Movement Disorders
Neurology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

Total: 21 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf