hkr.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Theorising teaching and learning: pre-service teachers’ theoretical awareness of learning
Gothenburg University.
Gothenburg University.
Kristianstad University, School of Education and Environment, Avdelningen för Pedagogik. Kristianstad University, Forskningsmiljön Forskning Relationell Pedagogik (FoRP).
Kristianstad University, School of Education and Environment, Avdelningen för Pedagogik. Kristianstad University, Plattformen för forskning om verksamhetsförlagd utbildning och professionslärande. Kristianstad University, Forskningsmiljön Forskning Relationell Pedagogik (FoRP).
2015 (English)In: European Journal of Teacher Education, ISSN 0261-9768, E-ISSN 1469-5928, Vol. 38, no 1, 102-118 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

We examine pre-service teachers’ theoretical learning during one five-week training module, and their educators’ learning about better lecture design to foster student learning. The study is iterative: interventions (one per group) were implemented sequentially in student groups A–C, the results of the previous intervention serving as the baseline for the design developed for the next. These learning study participants, 79 students from year three of a teacher training programme, studied the variation theory (VT) of learning. Three lesson cycles were completed, each comprising four steps: (1) a pre-test, (2) a 15-min intervention discussing VT, (3) a post-test and (4) a delayed post-test conducted eight weeks later. The results indicated learning differences between groups; qualitative analysis identified three categories of student answers, i.e. emergent, premature and unaware, regarding their theoretical understanding. Group C had more students with emergent knowledge (36%) than did groups A (20%) or B (17%) at post-testing.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2015. Vol. 38, no 1, 102-118 p.
Keyword [en]
teacher education, learning study, variation theory, object of learning, critical aspects of learning
National Category
Educational Sciences Pedagogy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hkr:diva-12153DOI: 10.1080/02619768.2014.902437ISI: 000345364600008OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hkr-12153DiVA: diva2:727974
Available from: 2014-06-23 Created: 2014-06-17 Last updated: 2015-12-24Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Holmquist, Per-OlaPalla, Marta
By organisation
Avdelningen för PedagogikForskningsmiljön Forskning Relationell Pedagogik (FoRP)Plattformen för forskning om verksamhetsförlagd utbildning och professionslärande
In the same journal
European Journal of Teacher Education
Educational SciencesPedagogy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

Total: 100 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf