hkr.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Prioritization and resource allocation in health care: the views of older people receiving continuous public care and service.
Lunds universitet.
Lunds universitet.
Lunds universitet.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0161-4795
2007 (English)In: Health Expectations, ISSN 1369-6513, E-ISSN 1369-7625, Vol. 10, no 2, 117-128 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

OBJECTIVE: To describe the views of people, 65 years and over, receiving continuous public care and service, on prioritization and resource allocation in health care, in relation to gender, age, housing, health-related quality of life (QoL) and degree of activities of daily living (ADL) dependency.

BACKGROUND: How older people receiving continuous public care and service view prioritization and resource allocation in health care is sparsely investigated, although this group most certainly has the experience and also often is the target in discussions concerning prioritization. It is necessary, for democracy and for the development of new models of service delivery, to find out how people receiving long-term care and service view these issues.

DESIGN: 146 persons, 34 men (23%) and 112 women (77%), aged 66-100 years were interviewed face to face, following a structured questionnaire.

RESULTS: The respondents thought that the patients' well-being, way of living and family situation should affect prioritization, not age per se. Resourcing of several health-care services were considered to be below what is required by a majority of the respondents. The respondents wanted doctors to decide on prioritization at an individual level and wanted higher taxes to finance increasing health-care costs. Although the respondents wanted publicly financed health care, a relatively high number were willing to pay for treatment.

CONCLUSIONS: Knowledge of how older people receiving care and services, view prioritization and resource allocation has not previously been available. It seems that their views are in line with the Swedish Parliamentary Priority Commission which suggested that no account should be taken of age when allocating resources within the health-care system. Respondents' age, gender, housing, health-related QoL and degree of dependency in ADL had limited influence on their views of resource allocation.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2007. Vol. 10, no 2, 117-128 p.
National Category
Nursing
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hkr:diva-11929DOI: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2006.00426.xISI: 000246710400003PubMedID: 17524005OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hkr-11929DiVA: diva2:710481
Available from: 2014-04-07 Created: 2014-04-07 Last updated: 2017-12-05Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedPreprint

Authority records BETA

Edberg, Anna-Karin

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Edberg, Anna-Karin
In the same journal
Health Expectations
Nursing

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 18 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf