hkr.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
PCR amplification of microalgal DNA for sequencing and species identification: studies on fixatives and algal growth stages
Marine Botany, Department of Marine Ecology, Göteborg University.
Biology Department, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole.
Biology Department, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8059-0156
2002 (English)In: Harmful Algae, ISSN 1568-9883, E-ISSN 1878-1470, Vol. 1, no 4, 375-382 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Cultured strains and individually isolated dinoflagellate cells from field samples were preserved in different fixatives to find a method of cell preservation that could provide DNA template in PCR reactions and preserve cell morphology for microscopic studies. Lugol’s solution and various ethanol concentrations all showed shortcomings, whereas an initial formalin preservation step followed by storage in 100% methanol fulfilled both demands. Cells could be stored up to 1 year and still provide functional DNA template for positive PCR reactions. The amplified fragment was approximately 700 bp of the D1/D2 region of the LSU rDNA, which is to our knowledge significantly longer than the low-molecular-weight DNA typically reported from formalin preserved samples. By cloning and sequencing the PCR product and subsequently aligning the sequences with previously sequenced fragments of the same or similar species, we confirmed that no base pair alteration had taken place during the time that the cells were fixed and frozen. In another experiment it was demonstrated that the growth phase of cultured Alexandrium minutum did not have any influence on the result of PCR reactions. This was true for extracted DNA from cultures and for direct PCR with a small number of disrupted cells. Phenol/chlorophorm/isoamylalcohol extraction proved to be an unpredictable method for DNA extraction, whereas direct PCR on isolated cells was more reliable. Extracted DNA purified with a commercial DNA cleaning kit always rendered a positive PCR. The environmental condition for cells to be used as DNA template in PCR is discussed.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2002. Vol. 1, no 4, 375-382 p.
Keyword [en]
Dinoflagellate, Dinophyceae, Growth stage, PCR, Preservatives
National Category
Biological Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hkr:diva-10971DOI: 10.1016/S1568-9883(02)00049-5OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hkr-10971DiVA: diva2:642032
Available from: 2013-08-20 Created: 2013-08-20 Last updated: 2017-12-06Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records BETA

Rehnstam-Holm, Ann-Sofi

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Rehnstam-Holm, Ann-Sofi
In the same journal
Harmful Algae
Biological Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 29 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf