hkr.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Complex object of learning: how to improve learning democracy at school by the use of Variation Theory and Learning
University of Gothenburg.
2012 (English)In: Abstracts book, 2012, p. 132-Conference paper, Oral presentation with published abstract (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

The aim of this study is to test in what way variation theory (VT) can serve as a guiding principle when learning an abstract concept like democracy. The model Learning study is used, which is a kind of lesson study in combination with the theoretical framework of a learning theory (LT). The iterative process means designing the forthcoming lessons based on the results and analysis of the data from the previous lessons. The data consists of pre/post-tests and video-observed lessons. The study contains four research sessions with four different groups of pupils in three different schools in grade 6 at the compulsory school. In total two teachers and 78 students participated during the four research sessions, one lesson per group. The first lesson (A) included 21 students, the second (B) 17 students, the third (C) 21 students, and in the final session (D) there were in total 19 pupils. The research sessions were 80 minutes each, and the planning was guided by the variation theory. The results show that the teachers' different ways of presenting aspects on the object of learning – democracy - different aspects where possible to discern. The different patterns of variation used are described in relation to differences in the students’ learning outcome. In all lessons democracy was contrasted against dictatorship. In order to facilitate learning different aspects of the object of learning were designed in a pattern of variation to see if and in that case what kind of differences this meant for the students. The results show that in group A the test scores increased by 63%, in group B the increase was 32%, group C 29% and in the last group (D) the test scores increased by 91%.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2012. p. 132-
Keywords [en]
variation theory, learning study, democracy, learning, instruction
National Category
Pedagogy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hkr:diva-9899OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hkr-9899DiVA, id: diva2:574736
Conference
WALS 2012
Available from: 2012-12-06 Created: 2012-12-06 Last updated: 2021-09-22Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(90 kB)704 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 90 kBChecksum SHA-512
e8d9252c3a978bc818e44b4b6839fc6de36d03aaddf427f68a8c434e5efbbbac841d760e41a0604c3e464424b2a7a640d10c60f17dd1d31b926928baff43861c
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Fulltext

Authority records

Holmqvist Olander, Mona

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Holmqvist Olander, Mona
Pedagogy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 704 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 502 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf