hkr.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
A seven country comparison of nurses’ perceptions of their professional practise environment
Lecturer, Department of Nursing, School of Health Studies, Cyprus University of Technology, Limassol.
Lecturer, Department of Nursing, School of Health Studies, Cyprus University of Technology, Limassol.
Florence Nightingale School of Nursing, Istanbul University.
Nursing research and development Unity ui&de), Lisbon.
Show others and affiliations
2012 (English)In: Journal of Nursing Management, ISSN 0966-0429, E-ISSN 1365-2834, Vol. 20, no 2, p. 236-248Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Aims  To describe and compare nurses’ perceptions of their professional practice environment in seven countries.

Background  There is evidence of variation in the nursing professional practice environments internationally. These different work environments affect nurses’ ability to perform and are linked to differing nurse and patient outcomes.

Methods  A descriptive, comparative survey was used to collect data from orthopaedic and trauma nurses (n = 1156) in Finland, Cyprus, Greece, Portugal, Sweden, Turkey and Kansas, USA using the 39-item Revised Professional Practice Environment instrument.

Results  Differences were found between participants from the northern countries of Europe, Kansas, USA, and the Mediterranean countries regarding perceptions about control over practice. No between-country differences were reported in the internal work motivation among the nurses from any of the participating countries.

Conclusions  Although between-country differences in nurses’ professional practice environment were found, difficulties related to demographic, cultural and health system differences and the way in which nursing is defined in each country need to be considered in the interpretation of the results.

Implications for Nursing Management  The results support investment to improve nurse’s work environment, which is important for improving the quality of patient care, optimizing patient outcomes and developing the nursing workforce.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2012. Vol. 20, no 2, p. 236-248
Keywords [en]
cross-country comparison, international, nursing, Professional Practice Environment, questionnaire
National Category
Nursing
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hkr:diva-9039DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2011.01289.xISI: 000300934600011PubMedID: 22050114OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hkr-9039DiVA, id: diva2:503742
Available from: 2012-02-16 Created: 2012-02-16 Last updated: 2017-12-07Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Authority records

Berg, Agneta

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Berg, Agneta
By organisation
School of Health and SocietyForskningsplattformen Hälsa i samverkan
In the same journal
Journal of Nursing Management
Nursing

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 186 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf