hkr.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Older people's views of prioritization in health care: the applicability of an interview study
Department of Health Sciences, Division of Gerontology and Caring Sciences, Lund University. (Avdelningen för Hälsovetenskap)ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0161-4795
Show others and affiliations
2005 (English)In: Journal of Clinical Nursing, ISSN 0962-1067, E-ISSN 1365-2702, Vol. 14, no 8B, 64-74 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

AIM: Older people's views of prioritization in health care. The applicability of an interview study. Old age has been stated as a criterion for prioritization in health care, although older people are seldom asked for their opinions. The aim of this pilot study was to investigate the applicability of a questionnaire as a base for an interview study to explore older people's experiences and views of prioritization in health care.

DESIGN: Descriptive, with a qualitative and quantitative approach. Fifty-four persons, 32 women and 22 men (aged 60-93 years), were asked to participate in a structured, tape-recorded interview covering their experience and views of the priorities applied in health care.

RESULTS: The questions in the interview manual appeared to be applicable for collecting data concerning views of prioritization, but the analysis revealed that certain questions, particularly on economic matters, were missing. The procedure, a personal structured interview had advantages, for example, in capturing the respondents' reflections on the questions. The respondents emphasized the equal value of all human beings and that age is not a basis for prioritization within health care. The respondents also showed an unwillingness to precede anyone in rank.

IMPLICATIONS: The questions used proved to be adequate but to be really complete further questions need to be added. This pilot study indicates that older people's views on priorities in health care differ from those expressed by the younger population. The study therefore needs to be replicated in a larger sample to be fully able to understand older people's views of prioritization, which will require exploring gender and age differences as well as other aspects that may explain variations.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2005. Vol. 14, no 8B, 64-74 p.
Keyword [en]
health care, interview, older people, prioritization, questionnaire, view
National Category
Health Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hkr:diva-8891DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2005.01278.xPubMedID: 16083487OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hkr-8891DiVA: diva2:477114
Available from: 2012-01-12 Created: 2012-01-12 Last updated: 2015-01-02Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Edberg, Anna-Karin
In the same journal
Journal of Clinical Nursing
Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

Total: 33 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf