hkr.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Communicative Learning in Teaching Materials: A Study of Speaking Tasksin Contemporary Grade-8 EnglishTextbooks in China and Sweden
Kristianstad University, School of Education and Environment.
2011 (English)Independent thesis Basic level (degree of Bachelor), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

Currently, Communicative Language Teaching has been popular around the world andhas a profound effect on second language acquisition since the 1970s. ForCommunicative Language Teaching to be successful, there is a need for appropriateteaching materials.This paper analyzes speaking tasks in Chinese and Swedish textbooks for grade 8,Gofor it and Magic. The analysis presents content analysis, providing a general overviewof speaking tasks found in both textbooks. First, task description is analyzed, whichprovides the pupils with the topics of tasks in both textbooks. It will be seen if thetopics are real-life. Second, types of speaking, text type, cognitive processes, focus,classroom organization are quantitively analyzed to see if there are differentapproaches to Communicative Language Teaching between Chinese and Swedishtextbooks.Through comparison of these six aspects in different textbooks, there are three similarapproaches to Communicative Language Teaching: First, they both have real-worldtopics under which there are many real-world speaking tasks. Second, the dialoguesplay a main role in both textbooks. Third, pair and group work have dominantposition in these two books.Also there are three different approaches to Communicative Language Teaching: First,the Chinese textbook is directed towards accuracy while the Swedish textbook isdirected towards fluency. Second, the Chinese textbook focuses on form whereas theSwedish textbook focuses on meaning. Third, there is an information-gap approach inthe Chinese textbook where tasks based on information gap are obviously labeled.However, it cannot be found in the Swedish textbook.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2011. , p. 33
Keywords [en]
speaking tasks, content analysis, Communicative Language Teaching
National Category
Pedagogy Social Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hkr:diva-8746OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hkr-8746DiVA, id: diva2:458467
Subject / course
English
Uppsok
Social and Behavioural Science, Law
Supervisors
Available from: 2011-11-24 Created: 2011-11-23 Last updated: 2011-11-24Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(318 kB)962 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 318 kBChecksum SHA-512
62237e37c574ce9c868f8992be6fd2b14350de270a01bbe2f3c3529109f3bca8ef7d0b91de3c649aeba0e61e04453c93dc3445881cdad176ec90d7ab58474344
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
School of Education and Environment
PedagogySocial Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 962 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 671 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf