hkr.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Students' socio-scientific reasoning in an astrobiology context during work with a digital learning environment
Kristianstad University, School of Education and Environment. (LISMA)ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3175-5185
Kristianstad University, School of Education and Environment. (LISMA)ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4792-8749
Kristianstad University, School of Education and Environment. (LISMA)
2011 (English)In: Journal of Science Education and Technology, ISSN 1059-0145, E-ISSN 1573-1839, Vol. 20, no 4, 388-402 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

In a European project—CoReflect—researchersin seven countries are developing, implementing andevaluating teaching sequences using a web-based platform(STOCHASMOS). The interactive web-based inquirymaterials support collaborative and reflective work. Thelearning environments will be iteratively tested and refined,during different phases of the project. All learning environmentsare focusing ‘‘socio-scientific issues’’. In thisarticle we report from the pilot implementation of theSwedish learning environment which has an Astrobiologycontext. The socio-scientific driving questions are ‘‘Shouldwe look for, and try to contact, extraterrestrial life?’’, and‘‘Should we transform Mars into a planet where humanscan live in the future?’’ The students were in their last yearof compulsory school (16 years old), and worked togetherin triads. We report from the groups’ decisions and thesupport used for their claims. On a group level a majorityof the student groups in their final statements expressreluctance towards both the search of extraterrestrial lifeand the terraforming of Mars. The support used by thestudents are reported and discussed. We also look moreclosely into the argumentation of one of the student groups.The results presented in this article, differ from earlierstudies on students’ argumentation and decision making onsocio-scientific issues (Aikenhead in Science education foreveryday life. Evidence-based practice. Teachers CollegePress, New York, (2006) for an overview), in that theysuggest that students do use science related arguments — both from ‘‘core’’ and ‘‘frontier’’ science — in their argumentationand decision making.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2011. Vol. 20, no 4, 388-402 p.
Keyword [en]
Socio scientific issues, ICT, Astrobiology, Digital learning environment, Lower secondary students
National Category
Didactics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hkr:diva-7711DOI: 10.1007/s10956-010-9260-5ISI: 000293025200006OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hkr-7711DiVA: diva2:393748
Projects
CoReflect
Available from: 2011-02-01 Created: 2011-02-01 Last updated: 2014-07-24Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records BETA

Hansson, LenaRedfors, AndreasRosberg, Maria

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Hansson, LenaRedfors, AndreasRosberg, Maria
By organisation
School of Education and Environment
In the same journal
Journal of Science Education and Technology
Didactics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 319 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf