Surgical treatment of peri-implantitis with or without a deproteinized bovine bone mineral and a native bilayer collagen membrane: A randomized clinical trial
2021 (English)In: Journal of Clinical Periodontology, ISSN 0303-6979, E-ISSN 1600-051X, Vol. 48, no 10, p. 1312-1321Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]
AIM: To assess whether the use of deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) and native bilayer collagen membrane (NBCM) improved healing of peri-implantitis-related bone defects at 12 months.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a multicentre randomized clinical trial, 32 individuals received surgical debridement (CG), and 34 adjunct use of DBBM and NBCM (TG). Radiographic defect fill (RDF), probing pocket depth (PPD), bleeding on probing (BOP) suppuration (SUP), recession (REC), cytokines (IL-1β, IL-1ra, IL-6, IL-8, IL-12, IP10, PDGF-BB, TNF-α, VEGF), and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were evaluated at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months.
RESULTS: RDF at deepest site amounted 2.7 ± 1.3 mm in TG and 1.4 ± 1.2 mm in CG (p < 0.0001). PPD was reduced by 1.9 mm in TG and 2.3 mm in CG (p =0.5783). There were no significant differences between groups regarding reductions of BOP, SUP, REC, cytokines levels, or OHIP 14 scores at 12 months. Successful treatment (RDF ≥1.0 mm, PPD ≤5 mm, ≤1/4 site with BOP grade 1, no SUP) were identified in 32% in TG and 21 % in CG.
CONCLUSIONS: DBBM and NBCM resulted in significantly more RDF than debridement alone. No difference was found in any clinical parameters or PROs between groups.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2021. Vol. 48, no 10, p. 1312-1321
Keywords [en]
bone augmentation, bone substitute, deproteinized bovine bone mineral, native bilayer collagen membrane, peri-implantitis, surgical treatment
National Category
Dentistry
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hkr:diva-22099DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.13513ISI: 000679129500001PubMedID: 34169551OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hkr-22099DiVA, id: diva2:1573650
Note
Stefan Renvert received grants and personal fees from Geistlich Pharma AG during the conduct of the study. Jean-Louis Giovannoli received grants from Geistlich Pharma AG during the conduct of the study. Ann-Marie Roos-Jansåker received grants from Geistlich Pharma AG during the conduct of the study and personal fees from Unident AB, Sweden, outside the submitted work. Sven Rinke received grants and personal fees from Geistlich Pharma AG during the conduct of the study.
2021-06-262021-06-262021-09-28Bibliographically approved