hkr.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Meetings or power weeks?: boundary work in a transnational police project
Lunds universitet.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9780-7569
Lunds universitet.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6271-5659
Lunds universitet.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2189-1928
2020 (English)In: Qualitative Sociology Review, E-ISSN 1733-8077, Vol. 16, no 3, p. 70-84Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Meetings are common in contemporary working life, but they are often overlooked in academic studies and sometimes defined as empty or boring by employees. Yet, the meeting society is being reproduced again and again. There seem to be hidden ways to incorporate meetings into today’s working life without arousing critique about pointless activities and deviations from what should really be done. One strategy was illustrated in a study of a transnational police project. Police culture celebrates visible crime fighting, which is associated with action, physical toughness, and capturing criminals. The police officers involved in the project emphasized the need to avoid “a lot of meetings,” but de facto constructed their project as meetings. Nonetheless, the project was declared a success. We analyze this paradox in terms of boundary work concerning meetings; the police officers turned some meetings into “real police work” by discursively and practically removing them from the category of bureaucracy and its associations with formalities, rigidity, and documentation. The most important example is how an “operational action group meeting” was renamed “power weeks,” eradicating the very word “meeting” from the term. This was closely associated with increased informality and multi-tasking during these gatherings.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2020. Vol. 16, no 3, p. 70-84
Keywords [en]
Occupational culture, identity, meetings, border police, project, bureaucracy
National Category
Other Social Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hkr:diva-21604DOI: 10.18778/1733-8077.16.3.05OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hkr-21604DiVA, id: diva2:1523618
Available from: 2021-01-28 Created: 2021-01-28 Last updated: 2024-03-06Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(376 kB)63 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 376 kBChecksum SHA-512
dbe409354625f5c21517dffdc8194852d3c6d116d165e6c8ef442f35a4c2c31ba308802e7f6a0952d815173a20bfb8857a08a05aed21ab2fbd1836e95db6ef58
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Åkerström, MalinWästerfors, DavidYakhlef, Sophia
In the same journal
Qualitative Sociology Review
Other Social Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 63 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 96 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf