hkr.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the Person-Centred Care Assessment Tool
Kina.
Kina.
Kina.
Australien.
Show others and affiliations
2020 (English)In: BMJ Open, E-ISSN 2044-6055, Vol. 10, no 7Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to test a Chinese cross-cultural adaptation of the English version of the Person-Centred Care Assessment Tool (P-CAT) and evaluate its psychometric properties.

DESIGN: P-CAT was translated/back-translated using established procedures before the psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version was made.

SETTING: Two hospitals covering urban and suburban areas of Kunming in the Yunnan province of China.

PARTICIPANTS: 152 female hospital staff completed the survey.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Construct validity and reliability, including internal consistency and test-retest reliability, were assessed among a sample of hospital staff.

RESULTS: The factor analysis resulted in a two-component solution that consisted of two subscales. The corrected item-total correlations for all of the items ranged from 0.14 to 0.44, with six items not meeting the cut-off level for item-total correlation (>0.3). The Chinese P-CAT demonstrated strong reliability, with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.91-0.94 for the scales and a test-retest reliability coefficient of 0.88 for the overall scale scores. The intraclass correlation was 0.92 (95% CI 0.90 to 0.95).

CONCLUSION: P-CAT appears to be a promising measure for evaluating staff perceptions of person-centredness in Chinese hospital environments. The results show that P-CAT can be a useful tool for improving the quality of healthcare in terms of person-centred care in the Chinese context.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2020. Vol. 10, no 7
Keywords [en]
factor analysis, instrument evaluation, older people, palliative care, person-centred care
National Category
Health Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hkr:diva-20923DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031580PubMedID: 32665340OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hkr-20923DiVA, id: diva2:1454782
Available from: 2020-07-20 Created: 2020-07-20 Last updated: 2023-08-28Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(327 kB)104 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 327 kBChecksum SHA-512
d12d76d3507e8cfabd49d2b1dec3449a432a3c6e831bfd0acc0accf55bc684e566a1345cca7583f387b59d6390e1e9682aed40f600c828e3d5893fdf7b9bd3df
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Behm, Lina
By organisation
Forskningsmiljön Människa - Hälsa - Samhälle (MHS)
In the same journal
BMJ Open
Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 104 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 88 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf