hkr.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Why are multi-centre clinical observational studies still so difficult to run?
England.
England.
England.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2218-6446
England.
Show others and affiliations
2011 (English)In: British Dental Journal, ISSN 0007-0610, E-ISSN 1476-5373, Vol. 211, no 2, p. 59-61Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Despite the introduction of IRAS, obtaining R&D approvals for multicentre studies is a major rate limiting step. Our experience with cleft research demonstrates that this approvals process must be drastically and rapidly improved if we wish to continue attract clinical research to the UK.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2011. Vol. 211, no 2, p. 59-61
National Category
Public Health, Global Health, Social Medicine and Epidemiology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hkr:diva-19496DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2011.570PubMedID: 21779057OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hkr-19496DiVA, id: diva2:1329831
Available from: 2019-06-24 Created: 2019-06-24 Last updated: 2019-09-18Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Persson, Martin
In the same journal
British Dental Journal
Public Health, Global Health, Social Medicine and Epidemiology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 9 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf