hkr.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Top management teams’ shared leadership and ambidexterity: the role of management control systems
Kristianstad University, Faculty of Business, Research environment Auditing, Organisation and Society (AOS). Kristianstad University, Faculty of Business, Avdelningen för ekonomi.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8938-2150
Kristianstad University, School of Health and Society. Kristianstad University, Faculty of Business, Research environment Auditing, Organisation and Society (AOS). Kristianstad University, Faculty of Business, Research environment Governance, Regulation, Internationalization and Performance (GRIP.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9289-2047
Kristianstad University, Faculty of Business.
Kristianstad University, Faculty of Business.
2018 (English)In: International Review of Administrative Sciences, ISSN 0020-8523, E-ISSN 1461-7226Article in journal (Refereed) Epub ahead of print
Abstract [en]

The study explores how top management teams’ shared leadership is related to organizational ambidexterity in public-sector organizations, theoretically and empirically considering how this relationship is contingent on the management control system. Using a sample of 85 Swedish municipal housing corporations, we find that shared leadership has a positive relationship with organizational ambidexterity in public-sector organizations. Moreover, increasing use of new public management control systems, based on combined reward and performance controls, positively moderates this relationship. The study also finds that traditional public management control systems, based on combined planning and administrative controls, do not moderate the relationship between top management teams’ shared leadership and organizational ambidexterity. Accordingly, this article contributes to the public and strategic management literature, as well as to managerial practice.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2018.
National Category
Business Administration
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hkr:diva-18647DOI: 10.1177/0020852318783539OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hkr-18647DiVA, id: diva2:1243000
Funder
Torsten Söderbergs stiftelse, E5/14Available from: 2018-08-29 Created: 2018-08-29 Last updated: 2019-06-24Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records BETA

Umans, TimursSmith, Elin

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Umans, TimursSmith, Elin
By organisation
Research environment Auditing, Organisation and Society (AOS)Avdelningen för ekonomiSchool of Health and SocietyResearch environment Governance, Regulation, Internationalization and Performance (GRIPFaculty of Business
In the same journal
International Review of Administrative Sciences
Business Administration

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 84 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf