hkr.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Self-assessment, self-regulated learning and self-efficacy: a meta-analysis
Kristianstad University, Faculty of Education, Research environment Learning in Science and Mathematics (LISMA). Kristianstad University, Faculty of Education, Avdelningen för matematik- och naturvetenskapernas didaktik. (LISMA)ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3251-6082
Spanien.
Spanien.
2018 (English)Conference paper, Oral presentation with published abstract (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Research about student self-assessment (SSA) has shown that academic performancetends to increase for students trained in SSA, but also that SSA training may increasethe use of self-regulated learning (SRL) strategies. Consequently, there is widespreadadvocacy for SSA, not least through the “assessment for learning” reform agenda. The educational gains from SSA are suggested to be related to the enhancement ofownership of learning and use of self-regulatory strategies. In addition, SSA has beensuggested to support students’ self-efficacy (SE). These relationships between SSA andSRL/SE, have been claimed theoretically, but without proper empirical support. Thisstudy therefore uses meta-analytic methodology to explore the relationships betweenSSA and SRL/SE. The 21 studies included in the analysis were found by a databasesearch and meta-analyses were conducted using a random-effect model. Inter-studyvariance was estimated by the maximum likelihood method. The findings from thisstudy confirms the theoretical connection between SSA and SRL/SE. By training inSSA, students’ use of self-regulating strategies for learning increase, while their use ofperformance/avoidance strategies decrease. SSA interventions also support students’ SE(.73), meaning that they have a more adequate perception of their own capabilities. Thefindings also confirm what has been noted in some of the individual studies on theeffects on SRL/SE from SSA interventions that girls tend to benefit more from suchinterventions, at least in relation to SE.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2018.
Keywords [en]
meta-analysis, self-assessment, self-regulated learning
National Category
Didactics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hkr:diva-18490OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hkr-18490DiVA, id: diva2:1238549
Conference
EARLI 2017, Tammerfors
Available from: 2018-08-14 Created: 2018-08-14 Last updated: 2018-10-22Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Jönsson, Anders
By organisation
Research environment Learning in Science and Mathematics (LISMA)Avdelningen för matematik- och naturvetenskapernas didaktik
Didactics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 523 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf