hkr.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Konsekvenser eller ett uppvaknande?: en kvantitativ studie på lång sikt av svenska aktiebolag med en fortlevnadsvarning
2017 (Swedish)Independent thesis Basic level (degree of Bachelor), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

The going concern warning and its consequences for auditors and companies have been studied from many different angles. However, the results are conflicting. A going concern warning is issued by an auditor when there is substantial doubt on the company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Studies have shown that most companies survive despite a going concern warning. There are also signs of short-term consequences for the companies. How the consequences unfold in the long run for companies that have received a going concern warning is not well studied.

The purpose of this study is to investigate how companies are affected in the long run by the consequences that can arise due to a going concern warning. For this study, a quantitative method has been used. Legitimacy theory, Interest theory and Institutional theory, have the common factor that they all explain how organizations survive in the long run. The theories, together with scientific articles and other relevant literature, have been used to develop the hypotheses.

Companies with a going concern warning have been compared with companies that have not received a going concern warning. Empirical data have been collected for 2010-2015 and by using multiple linear regressions the hypotheses of the study have been tested.

The result of the study showed that a going concern warning did not adversely affect the company on a long-term basis. On the contrary, the study indicates that companies with a going concern warning improve compared to equivalent companies which did not receive a going concern warning. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2017. , p. 59
Keyword [en]
Going-concern warning, long-term, stigmatization, audit, degree of severity, key performance indicators
National Category
Business Administration
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hkr:diva-17061OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hkr-17061DiVA, id: diva2:1129236
Subject / course
Accounting and auditing
Educational program
Degree of Bachelor of Science in Business and Economics
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2017-09-08 Created: 2017-08-01 Last updated: 2017-09-08Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(858 kB)42 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 858 kBChecksum SHA-512
abc9c1f6091a4e51f000bb722107da47f5241b4e927645d8afb9dedefde8c2e8bcb018d8814094dc4e900d8fee41beb1ddcde0f28a6c2c08edabea05d6b94662
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Business Administration

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 42 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 57 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf