hkr.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Reducing transportation emissions Company intentions, barriers and discriminating factors
Lund University.
Kristianstad University, School of Health and Society, Avdelningen för samhällsvetenskap och integrerad hälsovetenskap.
2016 (English)In: Benchmarking: An International Journal, ISSN 1463-5771, E-ISSN 1758-4094, Vol. 23, no 3, 674-703 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to examine the intention of companies to reduce transportation emissions by 2020 and the barriers and the discriminating factors that affect the reduction. Design/methodology/approach - A literature review identified potential logistical and technical actions and their barriers, and discriminating factors for reducing transportation emissions. A survey of freight transport-intensive industries in Sweden examined the effects of, intention for implementation of and barriers to 12 actions to reduce CO2 emissions from freight transportation. In total, 172 logistics managers responded, representing a response rate of 40.3 per cent. Findings - Logistics service providers (LSPs) and freight owners are likely to reduce a considerable amount of CO2 emissions from freight transportation by 2020 using a combination of actions. The lowest level of confidence was for reducing CO2 emissions by changing logistics structures, while there was greater confidence by means of operational changes. The actions have few barriers, but there is often a combination of barriers to overcome. Three discriminating factors influence the intention of a firm to reduce transportation emissions: perceived potential, company size and LSP/freight owner. The industrial sector of a freight owner has minor influence. Companies that are particularly likely to reduce emissions are LSPs, large companies, and those that perceive a large reduction potential. Research limitations/implications - Logistical and technical barriers appear to hinder companies from implementing actions, while organisational barriers and external prerequisites do not. Barriers cannot be used to predict companies' intentions to reduce transportation emissions. The authors examined the impact of three discriminating factors on reduction of transportation emissions. The research is based on perceptions of well-informed managers and on companies in Sweden. Practical implications - The findings can be used by managers to identify firms for benchmarking initiatives and emissions-reducing strategies. Originality/value - The study provides insights into intended CO2 reductions in transportation by 2020. It presents new knowledge regarding barriers and discriminating factors for implementing actions to reduce transportation emissions.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2016. Vol. 23, no 3, 674-703 p.
Keyword [en]
Sustainability, Survey, Logistics, Supply chain management, Transport, Emissions
National Category
Transport Systems and Logistics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hkr:diva-16298DOI: 10.1108/BIJ-03-2014-0025ISI: 000382537000009OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hkr-16298DiVA: diva2:1052875
Available from: 2016-12-07 Created: 2016-12-07 Last updated: 2016-12-07Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Johansson, Ola
By organisation
Avdelningen för samhällsvetenskap och integrerad hälsovetenskap
In the same journal
Benchmarking: An International Journal
Transport Systems and Logistics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

Total: 8 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf