hkr.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The Lund University Checklist for Incipient Exhaustion: a prospective validation of the onset of sustained stress and exhaustion warnings
Lund University.
Lund University.
Lund University.
Kristianstad University, School of Education and Environment, Avdelningen för Psykologi.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2921-3945
Show others and affiliations
2016 (English)In: BMC Public Health, E-ISSN 1471-2458, Vol. 16, article id 1025Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: The need for instruments that can assist in detecting the prodromal stages of stress-related exhaustion has been acknowledged. The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether the Lund University Checklist for Incipient Exhaustion (LUCIE) could accurately and prospectively detect the onset of incipient exhaustion and to what extent work stressor exposure and private burdens were associated with increasing LUCIE scores. Methods: Using surveys, 1355 employees were followed for 11 quarters. Participants with prospectively elevated LUCIE scores were targeted by three algorithms entailing 4 quarters: (1) abrupt onset to a sustained Stress Warning (n = 18), (2) gradual onset to a sustained Stress Warning (n = 42), and (3) sustained Exhaustion Warning (n = 36). The targeted participants' survey reports on changes in work situation and private life during the fulfillment of any algorithm criteria were analyzed, together with the interview data. Participants untargeted by the algorithms constituted a control group (n = 745). Results: Eighty-seven percent of participants fulfilling any LUCIE algorithm criteria (LUCIE indication cases) rated a negative change in their work situation during the 4 quarters, compared to 48 % of controls. Ratings of negative changes in private life were also more common in the LUCIE indication groups than among controls (58 % vs. 29 %), but free-text commentaries revealed that almost half of the ratings in the LUCIE indication groups were due to work-to-family conflicts and health problems caused by excessive workload, assigned more properly to work-related negative changes. When excluding the themes related to work-stress-related private life compromises, negative private life changes in the LUCIE indication groups dropped from 58 to 32 %, while only a negligible drop from 29 to 26 % was observed among controls. In retrospective interviews, 79 % of the LUCIE indication participants confirmed exclusively/predominantly work stressors, while 6 % described a predominance of private life stressors. Conclusions: Negative changes in the work situation were the most prominent change related to a sustained increase in LUCIE scores. The findings seem to confirm that LUCIE is a potentially useful tool for clinical screening of incipient work-related exhaustion.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2016. Vol. 16, article id 1025
Keywords [en]
Burnout, exhaustion disorder, KEDS, LUCIE, personality traits, stress
National Category
Psychology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hkr:diva-16200DOI: 10.1186/s12889-016-3720-7ISI: 000384375000007PubMedID: 27686242OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hkr-16200DiVA, id: diva2:1039032
Funder
Forte, Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare, 2011-0236Available from: 2016-10-20 Created: 2016-10-20 Last updated: 2023-08-28Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1763 kB)178 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1763 kBChecksum SHA-512
17d36b88c4b4e41390eb18999dc85c12be5e247e808288d7ff51d60aeccb43770b88fa2814813c8e3cd1412f4efb70d6f11072df8749e59f2ca541dba0d16018
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Authority records

Jönsson, Peter

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Jönsson, Peter
By organisation
Avdelningen för Psykologi
In the same journal
BMC Public Health
Psychology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 178 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 376 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf