hkr.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Psychometric evaluation of a Swedish version of Minneapolis-Manchester quality of life-youth form and adolescent form
Halmstad University.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5586-3810
Halmstad University.
Linnaeus University.
Halmstad University.
Show others and affiliations
2013 (English)In: Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, E-ISSN 1477-7525, Vol. 11, no 79Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background

It has become important to measure long-term effects and quality of life in survivors of childhood cancer. The Minneapolis- Manchester Quality of Life (MMQL) instrument has been proven to better capture the quality of life (QoL) perspective of health than other instruments. The instrument has age appropriate versions and is therefore favourable for longitudinal studies of QoL of children surviving from cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Swedish version of MMQL-Youth Form and the Adolescent Form focusing on: 1) face and content validity 2) the internal consistency and 3) the test-retest reliability.

Methods

The sample consisted of 950 pupils (11–16 years old) from 7 schools in the western Sweden who completed the questionnaire. For the test-retest evaluation 230 respondents completed the questionnaire two weeks later.

Results

Face and content validity was supported and internal consistency was found to be acceptable for the total scale for both the MMQL-Youth Form (8–12 years of age) and the Adolescent Form (13–20 years of age). Test-retest reliability for the MMQL-Youth Form was moderate for 50% of the items and good for the remaining. For the MMQL-Adolescent Form the test-retest showed moderate or good agreement for 80% of the items and fair for 20%.

Conclusions

The result indicated that the Swedish version of the MMQLYouth Form and Adolescent Form was valid and reliable in a sample of healthy children in a Swedish context. It is recommended to test the instrument among diverse samples of children such as survivors of childhood cancer in order to validate its usefulness in research and clinical settings.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2013. Vol. 11, no 79
Keywords [en]
Children, cancer, questionnaire, reliability, validity
National Category
Health Sciences Nursing
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hkr:diva-16165DOI: 10.1186/1477-7525-11-79ISI: 000318731100001PubMedID: 23656858OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hkr-16165DiVA, id: diva2:1037407
Available from: 2016-10-14 Created: 2016-10-14 Last updated: 2024-07-04Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. To promote health in children with experience of cancer treatment
Open this publication in new window or tab >>To promote health in children with experience of cancer treatment
2016 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
School of Health and Welfare, 2016
National Category
Health Sciences Nursing
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:hkr:diva-18549 (URN)978-91-85835-65-2 (ISBN)
Available from: 2018-08-29 Created: 2018-08-17 Last updated: 2018-08-29Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Authority records

Einberg, Eva-Lena

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Einberg, Eva-Lena
In the same journal
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
Health SciencesNursing

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 109 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf