hkr.sePublikationer
Ändra sökning
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Mechanical treatment of peri-implant mucositis: a double-blind randomized longitudinal clinical study
Högskolan Kristianstad, Sektionen för hälsa och samhälle.ORCID-id: 0000-0003-0992-2362
Högskolan Kristianstad, Sektionen för hälsa och samhälle.
Högskolan Kristianstad, Sektionen för hälsa och samhälle.
University of Bern.ORCID-id: 0000-0002-3620-5978
2009 (Engelska)Ingår i: Europerio 6: Stockholm, Sweden, 4-6 June 2009 / [ed] Tonetti, Maurizio, Renvert, Stefan, 2009, s. 24-Konferensbidrag, Muntlig presentation med publicerat abstract (Refereegranskat)
Abstract [en]

Background: Infection and inflammation in tissues adjacent to dental implants are common. There are few controlled studies assessing interventions. We assessed if mechanical debridement with titanium curettes, is equally effective as an ultrasonic device in reducing clinical signs of inflammation and the total bacterial load. Materials and methods: Thrity two subjects (mean age 62.5 S.D ± 11.7) with one implant each demonstrating peri-implantitis were randomized in two intervention groups. Clinical and microbiological data were obtained before and during 6 months. Group one received debridement using titanium hand-instruments and group two received ultrasonic treatment using a coated working end. Results: At the different time-points, data analysis by independent t–test, or Mann–Whitney U tests failed to demonstrate group differences. Comparing baseline data with results at 6 months (merged groups) demonstrated that overall PI scores and at implants decreased (mean diff: 20.2%, S.E ± 6.3, 95%CI: 7.0 to 32.7, P < 0.002) and (mean diff: 27.2% S.E ± 7.9, 95%CI: 11.3 to 43.1, P < 0.001). Bleeding scores at implants improved (P < 0.01). PPD scores at implants did not improve (P = 0.30). Conclusions: No differences in treatment outcomes between the two treatment methods studied were found. While PI and BOP scores improved no effects in PPD were identified.

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
2009. s. 24-
Serie
Journal of Clinical Periodontology, ISSN 0303-6979 ; 36(Suppl. 9)
Nationell ämneskategori
Odontologi
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:hkr:diva-5496DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2009.01403.xOAI: oai:DiVA.org:hkr-5496DiVA, id: diva2:280551
Konferens
Europerio 6
Tillgänglig från: 2009-12-10 Skapad: 2009-12-10 Senast uppdaterad: 2014-09-18Bibliografiskt granskad

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltext saknas i DiVA

Övriga länkar

Förlagets fulltext

Personposter BETA

Renvert, StefanLindahl, ChristelPersson, G. Rutger

Sök vidare i DiVA

Av författaren/redaktören
Renvert, StefanLindahl, ChristelPersson, G. Rutger
Av organisationen
Sektionen för hälsa och samhälle
Odontologi

Sök vidare utanför DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetricpoäng

doi
urn-nbn
Totalt: 141 träffar
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf