hkr.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Voices of female and male authorship: legitimations and discourses in literature textbooks
Kristianstad University, Faculty of Education, Avdelningen för humaniora.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5311-3533
2018 (English)In: IARTEM e-journal, ISSN 1837-2104, ISSN 1837-2104, Vol. 10, no 1-2, p. 5-22Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The literature textbook contains a range of voices (e.g. the textbook writer, the authors, experts etc.) who legitimize certain perspectives on the authorship (Dahl 2015). The aim of this paper is to discuss how voices are used and combined to legitimize female and male authorship in five literature textbooks for upper secondary schools in Sweden. The analysis is based on Theo van Leeuwen’s (2007) concept of legitimation, Bakhtin’s (1991) concept of voice and Norman Fairclough’s (1992) concept of intertextuality and interdiscursivity. Intertextuality focuses on how voices, i.e. explicit references, are used to authorize a specific perspective on the authorship. Interdiscursivity highlights texts as social practices constituted by combinations of voices, discourses and genres. My analysis of interdiscursivity examines how voices and discourses are articulated in the legitimation of the authorship and how it is realized linguistically. The result indicates differences in how male and female authorship are legitimized. Typical for the discourse of the male authorship is that the textbook writer’s voice interacts with the voices of the author and authorities in literature, shaping a homophonic discourse in which literary concepts and theory are predominant. The male authorship is legitimized as artistically significant in the history of literature. In comparison, the legitimization of the female authorship is characterized by a monophonic discourse with few references to authorities in literature. Interdiscursively, the voice of the textbook writer is more evaluative and authoritative, and the legitimations focus on the author’s social and empathetic ability. The result raises questions about the construction of male and female identities and didactic implications regarding language, identity and power in textbooks.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2018. Vol. 10, no 1-2, p. 5-22
Keywords [en]
Gender, Discourse, Intertextuality, Voices, Legitimation, Literature textbooks, Literature history.
National Category
Humanities and the Arts
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hkr:diva-19827OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hkr-19827DiVA, id: diva2:1344416
Available from: 2019-08-20 Created: 2019-08-20 Last updated: 2019-08-21Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(292 kB)2 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 292 kBChecksum SHA-512
500f5b3d9dadb60cc27b4616a4824f44a57084eb84f7d9159433ec4e3b9921cdebbd8e690b0e95cc89027b10b42422852f386d57833b4d69e85c085303f258a8
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

https://biriwa.com/iartem/ejournal/volume10.1-2/articles/article_1_dahl_iartem_ej_2018-1-2.pdf

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Dahl, Christoffer
By organisation
Avdelningen för humaniora
In the same journal
IARTEM e-journal
Humanities and the Arts

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 2 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 47 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf