hkr.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Evaluation of self-management program outcomes: Adaptation and testing of a Swedish version of the Health Education Impact Questionnaire (heiQ)
Malmö University.
Lund University.
Blekinge County Council.
Kristianstad University, Faculty of Health Science, Research Environment PRO-CARE, Patient Reported Outcomes - Clinical Assessment Research and Education. Kristianstad University, Research Platform for Collaboration for Health. Kristianstad University, Faculty of Health Science, Avdelningen för sjuksköterskeutbildningarna och integrerad hälsovetenskap.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2174-372X
2018 (English)In: Journal of Applied Measurement, ISSN 1529-7713, Vol. 19, no 3, p. 303-319Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Self-management programs require a range of indicators to evaluate their outcomes. The Health Education Impact Questionnaire (heiQ) was developed to meet this need. The heiQ contains 40 items with 4 response categories, representing eight scales. We developed a Swedish version of the heiQ that was tested by cognitive interviews (n=15) and psychometrically (n=177) using classical test theory (CTT) and Rasch measurement theory (RMT). The Swedish heiQ was easily understood by interviewees and met CTT criteria, with supported scaling assumptions (corrected item-total correlations, ≥0.37) and reliability (ordinal alpha ≥0.78). General support was demonstrated for the measurement properties of the eight heiQ scales by acceptable RMT fit. However, there were signs of malfunctioning response categories for four items in two scales, and of suboptimal item coverage of the measurement continua. The Swedish heiQ appears comparable to other available language versions. Further efforts may be needed to optimize response categories and measurement precision. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2018. Vol. 19, no 3, p. 303-319
National Category
Health Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hkr:diva-18451PubMedID: 30169337OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hkr-18451DiVA, id: diva2:1237885
Available from: 2018-08-10 Created: 2018-08-10 Last updated: 2018-09-03Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

PubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Hagell, Peter
By organisation
Research Environment PRO-CARE, Patient Reported Outcomes - Clinical Assessment Research and EducationResearch Platform for Collaboration for HealthAvdelningen för sjuksköterskeutbildningarna och integrerad hälsovetenskap
In the same journal
Journal of Applied Measurement
Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 47 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf