hkr.sePublikationer
Ändra sökning
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Do comparisons of performance measures give misleading information?: the case of the Swedish water and sewage sector
Högskolan Kristianstad, Institutionen för ekonomi.
2003 (Engelska)Rapport (Övrigt vetenskapligt)
Abstract [en]

In recent years interest in benchmarking and comparisons of performance measures has increased mong Swedish municipalities. Comparisons of performance measures are used for different urposes. They are used in benchmarking processes, with the aim not only of improving perations but also of providing standards in the context of accountability. Regardless of the urpose of the comparisons of performance measures, it is important that the compared measures re defined and applied homogeneously and consistently, i.e. they must have information orrespondence in order to be comparable; otherwise, erroneous decisions can be made. owever, commensurability is not enough. If the compared measures are to have any information alue, the measures also need to be chosen carefully, so that, in a relevant and reliable way, they eflect the measured objects’ most important qualities. This paper analyses performance easures used in three benchmarking projects in the Swedish water and sewage sector. The easures are analysed in the light of how well they reflect the measured objects’ most important ualities, their relevance, commensurability, and reliability. The findings are distressing; the ppropriateness of the performance measures in these three projects must be strongly questioned. n particular, the measures were too aggregated as to capture, reproduce, and describe the most mportant qualities of the measured objects in a relevant way. As for commensurability, it was so oor that one is entitled to sk hether the comparisons are not doing more harm than good.

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
Kristianstad: Department of Business Studies, Kristianstad University College , 2003. , s. 23
Serie
Working paper series, ISSN 1650-0636 ; 2003:3
Nyckelord [en]
accountability, benchmarking, comparisons, commensurability, performance measures, reliability
Nationell ämneskategori
Företagsekonomi
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:hkr:diva-9429OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hkr-9429DiVA, id: diva2:535158
Tillgänglig från: 2012-06-19 Skapad: 2012-06-19Bibliografiskt granskad

Open Access i DiVA

fulltext(77 kB)258 nedladdningar
Filinformation
Filnamn FULLTEXT01.pdfFilstorlek 77 kBChecksumma SHA-512
d14482c1f56f0117c412a1c54514053021809709330ffb8b742bfd6e37e96e904fd2ab79861f56bbd8216881804bae8491b97ec8bc98d583fb2569e22a1b44bb
Typ fulltextMimetyp application/pdf

Av organisationen
Institutionen för ekonomi
Företagsekonomi

Sök vidare utanför DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Totalt: 258 nedladdningar
Antalet nedladdningar är summan av nedladdningar för alla fulltexter. Det kan inkludera t.ex tidigare versioner som nu inte längre är tillgängliga.

urn-nbn

Altmetricpoäng

urn-nbn
Totalt: 106 träffar
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf